We see the aggregated State Budget as neutral in regards to gender budgeting processes.  Of course, on multiple line ministries there are policies which seek and focus on targeting specific goals regarding the age, gender etc., which is in line with the government priorities.  Additionaly, in regards to the Act on Civil Service and payment conditions within the state sector- there is no direct discrimination stemming from the legislation either. Civil sector is being payed through standardized payment system (level of qualification and for how many years an individual worked for) which takes into account only age and qualification (degree etc) � active years of work experience and not gender, therefore there is no direct gender wage gap possible.     Nowadays, on State budget�s aggregated level we feel like this coverage is sufficient.  We do not plan on changing the Budgetary structure at this point, and it does not involve explicitly gender aspect, but as we say we see budgetary expenditures as neutral. Some ministries can monitor data about gender and impact on their policies, which we find sufficient enough, minding that we have stronly autonomous line ministries structure.    We note that the Governmnet�s Office has its Department for gender policies and it should seek and monitor which ministries and policies are needed to be divided and monitored by sector/gender and coordinate with them. MoF is at this point only cooperating subject, the Governments Office is the leading entity in this regard.