{"columns":[{"name":"Goal","type":"string"},{"name":"Target","type":"string"},{"name":"Indicator","type":"string"},{"name":"SeriesCode","type":"string"},{"name":"SeriesDescription","type":"string"},{"name":"GeoAreaCode","type":"string"},{"name":"GeoAreaName","type":"string"},{"name":"TimePeriod","type":"string"},{"name":"Value","type":"string"},{"name":"Time_Detail","type":"string"},{"name":"TimeCoverage","type":"string"},{"name":"UpperBound","type":"string"},{"name":"LowerBound","type":"string"},{"name":"BasePeriod","type":"string"},{"name":"Source","type":"string"},{"name":"GeoInfoUrl","type":"string"},{"name":"FootNote","type":"string"},{"name":"[Nature]","type":"string"},{"name":"[Observation Status]","type":"string"},{"name":"[Reporting Type]","type":"string"},{"name":"[Units]","type":"string"}],"n_rows":20,"rows_kept":20,"cut":false,"text_format":"parquet-jsonl-2026-10-02","bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"package_text_limit_bytes":33554432,"package_text_slack_bytes":1024,"rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096,"vector_min":64,"vector_head_fixed":16,"vector_head_variable":64,"kv_value_chars":1048576,"nesting_max":64,"binary_text":true},"cells_cut":0,"cells_bad_utf8":0,"cells_raw":0,"cells_binary":0,"cells_binary_text":0,"cells_vector":0,"n_row_groups":1,"reader":"pyarrow 23.0.1, python 3.13","created_by":"DuckDB version v1.2.2 (build 7c039464e4)","schema":{"fields":[{"name":"Goal","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"Target","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"Indicator","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"SeriesCode","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"SeriesDescription","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"GeoAreaCode","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"GeoAreaName","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"TimePeriod","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"Value","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"Time_Detail","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"TimeCoverage","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"UpperBound","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"LowerBound","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"BasePeriod","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"Source","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"GeoInfoUrl","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"FootNote","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"[Nature]","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"[Observation Status]","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"[Reporting Type]","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null},{"name":"[Units]","type":"string","nullable":true,"metadata":null,"children":null}],"parquet":"required group field_id=-1 duckdb_schema {\n  optional binary field_id=-1 Goal (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 Target (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 Indicator (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 SeriesCode (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 SeriesDescription (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 GeoAreaCode (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 GeoAreaName (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 TimePeriod (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 Value (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 Time_Detail (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 TimeCoverage (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 UpperBound (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 LowerBound (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 BasePeriod (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 Source (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 GeoInfoUrl (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 FootNote (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 [Nature] (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 [Observation Status] (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 [Reporting Type] (String);\n  optional binary field_id=-1 [Units] (String);\n}\n"},"kv_metadata":[]}
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","96","Brunei Darussalam","2018","39.05767","2018",null,null,null,null,"Special Committee for National Coordination for the SDGs",null,"Data as of September 2023","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","96","Brunei Darussalam","2019","73.48159","2019",null,null,null,null,"Special Committee for National Coordination for the SDGs",null,"Data as of September 2023","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","96","Brunei Darussalam","2020","71.4363","2020",null,null,null,null,"Special Committee for National Coordination for the SDGs",null,"Data as of September 2023","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","96","Brunei Darussalam","2021","74.36688","2021",null,null,null,null,"Special Committee for National Coordination for the SDGs",null,"Data as of September 2023","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","96","Brunei Darussalam","2022","5.39","2022",null,null,null,null,"Special Committee for National Coordination for the SDGs",null,"Data as of September 2023","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","96","Brunei Darussalam","2023","32.22","2023",null,null,null,null,"Special Committee for National Coordination for the SDGs",null,"Data as of September 2023","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","100","Bulgaria","2017","40749","2017",null,null,null,null,"Ministry of Environment and Water",null,"Floating liiter (in this case plastics) > 2.5 cm. Data is for 2016-2027 for coastal area of the Bulgarian part of the Black Sea","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","233","Estonia","2016","0.2","2016",null,null,null,null,"Ministry of Climate (MoC)",null,"Floating microplastics data is reported here, not macroplastics. Floating macroplastic is not permanently monitored in Estonia and is considered as an insignificant environmental problem in Estonian marine area. Data unit is \"average count of microplastic particles per 1 square meter\" (not per km2). Data collection methodology for floating microplastics can be found at HELCOM Guidelines on monitoring of microlitter in the water column in the Baltic Sea (https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-on-monitoring-of-microlitter-in-the-water-column-in-the-Baltic-Sea.pdf). In Estonia mainly Manta trawl (333 micrometer mesh-size) is used for microlitter sampling, which collects material from the upper layer of the watercolumn (up to 50 cm from sea surface). The amount of microlitter items has been varied a lot, being 0,05-0,62 items/m2 in different sampling stations and monitoring years. In recent years microplastic is monitored in 10 sampling sites, covering all parts of Estonian marine area; original monitoring data are available through SeaDataNet: https://cdi.seadatanet.org/search ","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","233","Estonia","2017","0.1","2017",null,null,null,null,"Ministry of Climate (MoC)",null,"Floating microplastics data is reported here, not macroplastics. Floating macroplastic is not permanently monitored in Estonia and is considered as an insignificant environmental problem in Estonian marine area. Data unit is \"average count of microplastic particles per 1 square meter\" (not per km2). Data collection methodology for floating microplastics can be found at HELCOM Guidelines on monitoring of microlitter in the water column in the Baltic Sea (https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-on-monitoring-of-microlitter-in-the-water-column-in-the-Baltic-Sea.pdf). In Estonia mainly Manta trawl (333 micrometer mesh-size) is used for microlitter sampling, which collects material from the upper layer of the watercolumn (up to 50 cm from sea surface). The amount of microlitter items has been varied a lot, being 0,05-0,62 items/m2 in different sampling stations and monitoring years. In recent years microplastic is monitored in 10 sampling sites, covering all parts of Estonian marine area; original monitoring data are available through SeaDataNet: https://cdi.seadatanet.org/search ","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","233","Estonia","2018","0.16","2018",null,null,null,null,"Ministry of Climate (MoC)",null,"Floating microplastics data is reported here, not macroplastics. Floating macroplastic is not permanently monitored in Estonia and is considered as an insignificant environmental problem in Estonian marine area. Data unit is \"average count of microplastic particles per 1 square meter\" (not per km2). Data collection methodology for floating microplastics can be found at HELCOM Guidelines on monitoring of microlitter in the water column in the Baltic Sea (https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-on-monitoring-of-microlitter-in-the-water-column-in-the-Baltic-Sea.pdf). In Estonia mainly Manta trawl (333 micrometer mesh-size) is used for microlitter sampling, which collects material from the upper layer of the watercolumn (up to 50 cm from sea surface). The amount of microlitter items has been varied a lot, being 0,05-0,62 items/m2 in different sampling stations and monitoring years. In recent years microplastic is monitored in 10 sampling sites, covering all parts of Estonian marine area; original monitoring data are available through SeaDataNet: https://cdi.seadatanet.org/search ","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","233","Estonia","2019","0.05","2019",null,null,null,null,"Ministry of Climate (MoC)",null,"Floating microplastics data is reported here, not macroplastics. Floating macroplastic is not permanently monitored in Estonia and is considered as an insignificant environmental problem in Estonian marine area. Data unit is \"average count of microplastic particles per 1 square meter\" (not per km2). Data collection methodology for floating microplastics can be found at HELCOM Guidelines on monitoring of microlitter in the water column in the Baltic Sea (https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-on-monitoring-of-microlitter-in-the-water-column-in-the-Baltic-Sea.pdf). In Estonia mainly Manta trawl (333 micrometer mesh-size) is used for microlitter sampling, which collects material from the upper layer of the watercolumn (up to 50 cm from sea surface). The amount of microlitter items has been varied a lot, being 0,05-0,62 items/m2 in different sampling stations and monitoring years. In recent years microplastic is monitored in 10 sampling sites, covering all parts of Estonian marine area; original monitoring data are available through SeaDataNet: https://cdi.seadatanet.org/search ","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","233","Estonia","2020","0.07","2020",null,null,null,null,"Ministry of Climate (MoC)",null,"Floating microplastics data is reported here, not macroplastics. Floating macroplastic is not permanently monitored in Estonia and is considered as an insignificant environmental problem in Estonian marine area. Data unit is \"average count of microplastic particles per 1 square meter\" (not per km2). Data collection methodology for floating microplastics can be found at HELCOM Guidelines on monitoring of microlitter in the water column in the Baltic Sea (https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-on-monitoring-of-microlitter-in-the-water-column-in-the-Baltic-Sea.pdf). In Estonia mainly Manta trawl (333 micrometer mesh-size) is used for microlitter sampling, which collects material from the upper layer of the watercolumn (up to 50 cm from sea surface). The amount of microlitter items has been varied a lot, being 0,05-0,62 items/m2 in different sampling stations and monitoring years. In recent years microplastic is monitored in 10 sampling sites, covering all parts of Estonian marine area; original monitoring data are available through SeaDataNet: https://cdi.seadatanet.org/search ","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","233","Estonia","2021","0.11","2021",null,null,null,null,"Ministry of Climate (MoC)",null,"Floating microplastics data is reported here, not macroplastics. Floating macroplastic is not permanently monitored in Estonia and is considered as an insignificant environmental problem in Estonian marine area. Data unit is \"average count of microplastic particles per 1 square meter\" (not per km2). Data collection methodology for floating microplastics can be found at HELCOM Guidelines on monitoring of microlitter in the water column in the Baltic Sea (https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-on-monitoring-of-microlitter-in-the-water-column-in-the-Baltic-Sea.pdf). In Estonia mainly Manta trawl (333 micrometer mesh-size) is used for microlitter sampling, which collects material from the upper layer of the watercolumn (up to 50 cm from sea surface). The amount of microlitter items has been varied a lot, being 0,05-0,62 items/m2 in different sampling stations and monitoring years. In recent years microplastic is monitored in 10 sampling sites, covering all parts of Estonian marine area; original monitoring data are available through SeaDataNet: https://cdi.seadatanet.org/search ","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","233","Estonia","2022","0.06","2022",null,null,null,null,"Ministry of Climate (MoC)",null,"Floating microplastics data is reported here, not macroplastics. Floating macroplastic is not permanently monitored in Estonia and is considered as an insignificant environmental problem in Estonian marine area. Data unit is \"average count of microplastic particles per 1 square meter\" (not per km2). Data collection methodology for floating microplastics can be found at HELCOM Guidelines on monitoring of microlitter in the water column in the Baltic Sea (https://helcom.fi/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/HELCOM-Guidelines-on-monitoring-of-microlitter-in-the-water-column-in-the-Baltic-Sea.pdf). In Estonia mainly Manta trawl (333 micrometer mesh-size) is used for microlitter sampling, which collects material from the upper layer of the watercolumn (up to 50 cm from sea surface). The amount of microlitter items has been varied a lot, being 0,05-0,62 items/m2 in different sampling stations and monitoring years. In recent years microplastic is monitored in 10 sampling sites, covering all parts of Estonian marine area; original monitoring data are available through SeaDataNet: https://cdi.seadatanet.org/search ","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","380","Italy","2019","108","2015-2018",null,null,null,null,"Italian National Institute of Statistics",null,"The source of the data is Superior Institute for Environmental Research and Protection (ISPRA).  During 2018-2022 105 objects in coastal areas and 3 in offshore areas objects/Km2.    Italy conducted a preliminary assessment phase to collect baseline data on floating macro marine litter (FMML) stratified by three main compartments: river mouths, coastal areas, and offshore. As of 2019, three standard programs have been defined to enable the implementation of time series. The applied methodologies descend from those developed under the RIMMEL (EU-JRC, Joint Research Centre) and MEDSEALITTER Interreg Med projects.","C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","404","Kenya","2019","353954.85894","2019",null,null,null,null,"Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute",null,null,"C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","404","Kenya","2020","269890.73738","2020",null,null,null,null,"Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute",null,null,"C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","404","Kenya","2021","5975811.07039","2021",null,null,null,null,"Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute",null,null,"C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","404","Kenya","2022","1381332.6818","2022",null,null,null,null,"Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute",null,null,"C","A","G","NUMBER"]
["14","14.1","14.1.1","EN_MAR_PLASDD","Floating plastic debris density (count per km2)","440","Lithuania","2021","0.99","2021",null,null,null,null,"Environmental Protection Agency",null,"Average count of microplastics per 1 litter of surface seawater","C","A","G","NUMBER"]